If you don't get your question answered among our posts, leave a question in the comments area. Subscribe to the blog feed and we'll get you an answer delivered right to your desktop or mobile device.
« January 2009 | Main | March 2009 »
If you don't get your question answered among our posts, leave a question in the comments area. Subscribe to the blog feed and we'll get you an answer delivered right to your desktop or mobile device.
Posted at 04:37 PM in Ask Us Questions | Permalink | Comments (14) | TrackBack (0)
Here in the Metroplex we’re blessed to have an economy that is still holding up under the economic turmoil. One of the key reasons is the stimulus created by the Barnett Shale. It has brought in money and jobs at a very important time when other geographic areas of our country have been hard hit by widespread company layoffs and closures.
Just this week, on MSNBC.com Brett Johnson reported, ... Despite tough economic times nationally, Forbes Magazine named Fort Worth among the Top Five "Best Cities for Jobs." Fort Worth Mayor Moncrief credits the Barnett Shale as representing "an enormous advantage for our local economy.
Often we don’t think about the smaller one-industry communities such as Elkhart, Indiana that are really struggling because residents don’t have jobs. Do you think that if they had natural gas under their feet that they would be complaining?
It is amazing that in light of what could be happening in our area economically that some individuals still choose to complain about gas wells and complain about how much money they’re not getting in signing bonus income. Why not be a little thankful that the opportunity to exercise your mineral rights still exists? And, why not look at the bright side of royalty income instead of focusing on what has become the new lower initial bonus nation wide?
While your job may not directly depend upon the Barnett Shale, in many instances the shale is indirectly responsible for the success of many different types of local businesses. For instance, people are still going out to eat and still shopping. DFW citizens are still purchasing vehicles and homes. Earnings from natural gas production companies have not only placed money in the pockets of individual mineral owners, but they have also placed money in the hands of local charities in the area too.
So the next time you start to sound off against natural gas, count to ten and be thankful that our area is still blessed with bountiful resources and by comparison to other areas of the country, has continuing prosperity.
What does it mean if you are notified that your home is not part of a preliminary pooling unit? Should you be concerned? What should you do?
If you have received a “cut-out” notice, it most likely means that your property is located in an area that has generally not responded to a company’s mineral leasing offers. Due to increased expense, companies prefer not to run horizontal pipe in zigzag patterns a mile beneath the surface as they would need to do in a “patchwork” area where leasing is very scattered.
After some point in time, the company makes the decision to stop wasting time and money to go after certain leases. When a resident receives a “preliminary pool unit cut-out” notice some homeowners who have been hanging back and holding out actually feel as though they have missed out. These people then call the gas production company and want to be included. Unfortunately, after making a diligent effort to acquire the lease, Cherokee Horn has already withdrawn the offer and ceased communication.
Will a homeowner who calls be allowed back into the preliminary pool unit? No. Their call does not change the situation that prompted the “cut-out” notice. Can anything change their cut-out status? Perhaps.
After a preliminary pool unit is formed, Cherokee Horn works with Titan to decide on the boundaries that would geologically feasible for drilling a mile and a half under the surface. Titan then goes to the Railroad Commission with their final pool unit boundaries for permit.
By now, if a homeowner who is “missing the boat” goes out and gets all of the neighbors on their street who haven’t signed to sign they still would not receive an offer from Cherokee Horn. They will be turned away.
Can that cut-out resident still collect royalties on the natural gas? Yes, but not in a timely manner and at their expense. There are also no signing bonuses.
Under the rules of “forced pooling,” these homeowners can petition the Texas Railroad Commission to be included in the final pool boundaries and they will be paid royalty income after all other expenses for drilling the well have been paid. This process is complex, involves your attorney, and becomes cost-prohibitive for properties under 1 acre.
In the worst turn of events, this is the end of the line for a hold-out.
If you would like to research the Railroad Commission's process, you can read up on Rule 37 and information on the Mineral Interest Pooling Act (MIPA).
Posted at 03:41 PM in Controversial Topics, Hold-out Groups, Leasing Questions, Signing Bonuses and Royalties | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack (0)
Maybe we can hope that change with a capital “C” really is beginning. Perhaps the greening of America is at last more than political rhetoric. Let’s believe that not only is our new president in favor of using more natural gas, but that Congress can also really work with him to get some important initiatives in place that will create more immediate uses for our country’s huge natural gas supply.
President Barack Obama’s chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel of Illinois has been one of Congress’s biggest proponents of compressed natural gas cars. Last summer he introduced legislation that would mandate US automakers to build 10 percent of their fleet with natural gas fueled vehicles by 2018. His bill also included tax credits and other incentives to spread natural gas pumps to filling stations across the country.
The bill has gone nowhere yet, but maybe that’s about to change.
Despite whatever may occur in the future that we can take issue with, it’s quite admirable that a former Illinois Congressman would be a proponent of natural gas as opposed to powering cars with corn. Illinois is in fact one of the top two corn growing states in America.
But life is always full of surprises and this is a good one. Using biofuels may be better than burning foreign oil, but using corn as a biofuel while people starve throughout the world, seems shortsighted. Why should we be turning corn or any other food into fuel for cars now that we have such an abundant of natural gas discoveries. Unlike corn and other food source biofuels, natural gas has only one real purpose and that is power.
More gas vehicles and greater availability of natural gas is a good thing, but supply and demand has always been the key to change in situations such as this. So let’s write our representatives, senators and our new president. Let’s get some demand going in the US to mandate more implementation of natural gas.
Posted at 09:45 AM in Of Community Interest, State and National Issues | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Another blog has a post advising homeowners should hold out for higher lease bonus offers which will come in based on the production of wells that have been permitted to the east of the Cherokee Horn well sites. Unfortunately, the size of a well’s production is no longer the reason for paying a higher bonus.
As we’ve pointed out in a previous post, the overall driving force for pricing is supply and demand. Right now and into the foreseeable future, supply is going to outweigh demand. Although companies would rather drill and get a lot of natural gas for their efforts, the more gas that goes into our nation’s pipeline’s the lower the price will be for the gas going to market.
Gas companies wish as strongly as residents that this scenario could be different, which it would be if more natural gas were used as fuel for power plants and as fuel for vehicles in the United States. The only other factor would be to begin shipping America’s natural gas out of the country to meet foreign demand.
The other idea brought up in the CPANA post was that the production of these other wells would bring offers from other companies to compete with Cherokee’s offer. However, this is not how it works.
Even if a nearby gas well was the mother load of all gas wells, a company without drill sites in the area has no reason to come in and purchase high dollar mineral leases in the “backyard” of another company’s “territory”. If they don’t have a drill site, then the only thing they could hope to do is to try to sell those high dollar mineral leases to Cherokee Horn and we’re not buying.
Lack of competition is not the factor driving lower mineral lease pricing. Supply, not just in the Barnett Shale but in other shale areas and non-American sources, is the driving force for pricing.
Posted at 06:34 AM in Controversial Topics, Hold-out Groups, Signing Bonuses and Royalties | Permalink | Comments (6) | TrackBack (0)